Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Black Hat SEO’

Lemonfree.com Busted For Buying Links? That’s Against Google’s Terms Of Service

November 11th, 2009 Mike No comments

Ever Wonder Why Lemonfree.com Shows Up In Searches?

It doesn’t matter if you’re a car dealer or a third party advertising company for used cars, the odds of getting somebody to naturally link to your site is pretty slim.

Many car dealers are so focused on keywords and meta tags they forget one of the most important aspects in search engine optimization which is backlinks.

If you don’t have links from other websites (especially links from related content sites) pointing to your website you simply will not show up in many search engine queries.

Many companies are forced to purchase links from relevant websites in order to help their rankings. If you read Google’s Webmaster Guidelines you will see that Google makes it clear that:

…… some SEOs and webmasters engage in the practice of buying and selling links that pass PageRank, disregarding the quality of the links, the sources, and the long-term impact it will have on their sites. Buying or selling links that pass PageRank is in violation of Google’s webmaster guidelines and can negatively impact a site’s ranking in search results.

We have a network of auto related websites, and we do not buy or sell links. If we did and Google caught us, we would be penalized and never show up in their search engines, which can be the kiss of death for any website, since Google accounts for about 80% of internet traffic.

Tonight I was checking one of my blog comments waiting for my approval. This is what I got:

Hello,

My name is Jamie Vanderhorst from lemonfree.com.

We are currently looking for advertising opportunities with qualified partners.

I came across your site blog.used-cars-fl.com and found your information and website very useful. I would like to buy a link: “corvette for sale” off your page http://blog.used-cars-fl.com/ – the link would point to (I deleted the link, but it was pointing to their website with the anchor text “Corvettes”.

In return, I’d send you $19.00 via PayPal for the link.

Let me know what you think of this deal.

Best,
Jamie Vanderhorst
Marketing Representative
lemonfree.com

Patrick Bennett and I have worked hard getting this site to rank and get some quality traffic. What really burns me is that they think they can buy us for a mere $18.00?

There is nothing a despise more than black hat SEO, which is what this is. As my duty, I am forced to report them to Google via Google Webmaster Tools.

In case there are other out there frustrated by Black Hat SEO Tactics, Matt Cutts from Google tells you what to do here.

Canned Spam Verse Internet Spam. The Battle For The Keyword Spam

August 23rd, 2009 Mike No comments
Canned SPAM

Canned SPAM

I’m not sure if there is anyone on the planet who never tried canned Spam, whether you like it or not. I was never a big fan making sandwiches out of Spam, but if you fry it up until it just starts burning right after the bubble appears it goes very well with eggs.

Just over 30 years ago Spam only meant one thing, a peculiar canned ham product that was pretty popular. Now most of us think of “Internet Spam” when we hear the word.

I’ve been doing some research on who coined the phrase “SPAM” from various internet sources. I have found 2 different answers, and I have no idea who is correct.

1) I read a forum comment by a man named Edward Falk. He said it was originated in 1985 :

The original use in a computing context was in 1985 when someone harassed a Pern MUSH by echoing “SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM…” repeatedly while the users were participating in a significant (for them) online event.  He was kicked off by the administrators, but afterwards was known as “that guy who spammed us”.  The term stuck, and the rest was history.

This seems to be possible because of the number of articles I found related to the origin of the word “SPAM”.

2) The rest of the internet community seems to think it was derived from a Monte Python skit. I personally buy the first one, but I can now see the relation to the Monte Python Video:

With this new definition of spam, I often wonder if this was a crisis for the company that makes Spam, Hormel Foods? Today, SPAM can be seen as an almost dirty word within the internet community. However, when I hear the word “Spam” coming from people like Matt Cutts from Google, (Head Of Google’s SPAM TEAM) I cannot help but to also thinking of having slighteley burned SPAM and eggs for breakfast tomorrow morning.

I’m sure this did kind of freak them out, even to this day. They actually have a comment about SPAM on their website (you really should read this).

What made me think of this SPAM post was the keyword “Spam”. I’m sure the makers of canned spam were forced to work extra hard to be sure they rank well on the keyword “SPAM”. If you Google the term, it will show over 223,000,000 pages. Now this is a word used every day in tweets, blog posts, emails, etc…

I would like to congratulate Hormel Foods for effectively owning the Keyword “SPAM” on all three major search engines.

If you are still not sure between the difference of Spam & Spam (spammer), maybe this will help:

This is a fried SPAM & Egg Sandwich. I highly recommend trying one.

This is a fried SPAM & Egg Sandwich. I highly recommend trying one.

Internet SPAM is tough to photograph, so here is a photo of a spammer:

Edward “Eddie” Davidson

Edward “Eddie” Davidson

Last year Edward Davidson was sentenced to 21 months in Federal prison, and fined $714,139 for being the alleged “King Of Spam”.

Categories: Black Hat SEO Tags: Black Hat SEO, spam

Boston College Endorses Black Hat SEO Tactics

March 2nd, 2009 admin No comments

On January 15th, 2009 I wrote a blog post about a sneaky used car dealer who had their link placed in the middle of a painfully long article.

If you look in the middle of this page you will see the term “used cars” was snuck in there with a link pointing to a used card dealer in Florida. For those who don’t know, a link like that will boost the dealer’s ranking in search engine search results (particularly Google) because it is coming from a reputable source. Furthermore, a .edu domain provides huge “link juice”. This is reffered to as “Black Hat SEO“.

Boston College did contact me about my post and said the link would be removed “sometime this week”. Well, as you can see the link is still there.

Is Boston College making money installing these links and supporting the Black Hat SEO Market? It appears so. Do they have an employee on the inside selling these links? It appears so doesn’t it?